{"id":3246,"date":"2020-08-25T08:01:14","date_gmt":"2020-08-25T16:01:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/?p=3246"},"modified":"2020-09-02T11:24:49","modified_gmt":"2020-09-02T19:24:49","slug":"its-still-june-somewhere-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/2020\/08\/25\/its-still-june-somewhere-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Still June Somewhere, Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li><i>The Girl Who Leapt Through Time<\/i> (2006): Second in a series of \u201cbittersweet, moving anime movies about adolescent feelings as crystallized through a speculative fiction device which I watched with Kat and her friends Courtney and Kailey, which activity has delivered some of my favorite moments in the last few months.\u201d Not quite the technical or emotional haymaker of <i>Your Name.<\/i> (2016), but why only compare it to the first movie in the series of \u201cbittersweet, moving anime movies about adolescent feelings as crystallized through a speculative fiction device which I watched with Kat and her friends Courtney and Kailey, which activity has delivered some of my favorite moments in the last few months?\u201d I wish I\u2019d known about this movie a decade ago, when it became clear that the entire genre of Teen Movies had given way to the juggernaut of Young Adult Adaptations\u2014two ways of telling a story with the same target audience but very different ways of getting there. I think this story draws a bridge between those approaches pretty well. The animation style is interesting: I\u2019d bet it made heavy use of rotoscoping, there\u2019s some frame-stretching every time they go to slow-mo, and the lighting on most of the characters is quite flat, all of which are ways to save money in production. But assuming that was a budget decision, I think it was a smart one, because it looks more stylized than cheap.<\/li>\n<li><i>A Whisker Away<\/i> (2020): See this is what I was talking about with \u201ca particular wistful, hazy-gold anime-style aesthetic\u201d back in my review of <i>Your Name.<\/i> Third in a series of \u201cbittersweet, moving anime movies about adolescent feelings as crystallized through a speculative fiction device which I watched with Kat and her friends Courtney and Kailey, which activity has delivered some of my favorite moments in the last few months\u201d but also the one that skews youngest\u2014more a middle grade story than a YA story, if that makes sense. It didn\u2019t get me quite as much as the others, and I had some difficulty tracking the pace of events, but the plot threw me some good curveballs! I wish it had been distributed under a direct translation of its Japanese title, <i>Wanting to Cry, I Pretend to Be a Cat.<\/i><\/li>\n<li><i>Cowboy Bebop: The Movie<\/i> (2001): Same animation-watching crew, same country of origin, but quite different otherwise. Kat led me through the entirety of Cowboy Bebop: The Series back in the spring, a formative influence on her and on many of my friends which I\u2019d never glanced at before. I liked it very much and I wish I\u2019d watched it sooner, and yes, yes, Lisa et al, you were right to pester me about it. That said, I\u2019m glad I got to watch this outside the context of its original release in September of 2001.<\/p>\n<p>The movie amounts to an extra-long episode of the series with more money involved, and since it came out after the series ended\u2014and was set partway through its chronology\u2014it\u2019s quite episodic. I was glad of the chance to hang out with all the characters again after the series conclusion, but that separation flattened its emotional impact. My least favorite TV trope is when the writers introduce <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Outrageous_Okona\">their new OC<\/a>, demand that we get emotionally involved in their story by having the whole recurring cast just react to them, and then heap pathos on <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Message_Firefly\">whatever happens to them<\/a>, from which we learn nothing about the main cast, and after which the guest is never mentioned again. It\u2019s not exactly a Mary Sue\u2014just a boring device that is invariably going to happen when you\u2019re a writers\u2019 room working on an episodic show. (This also happens a lot when you\u2019re playing a tabletop RPG with the kind of DM who\u2019s more interested in telling their own story than hearing yours.)<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, this movie <i>isn\u2019t<\/i> that, but its place in the canon means it can\u2019t quite avoid touching the trope with one toe. But I had a great time watching it! The fight animation looks great, the backgrounds have a beautiful depth, and I got to hear Kat clap and cackle when Spike says \u201cI love the kind of woman that can kick my ass.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li><i>To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar<\/i> (1995): Mmmaybe the first film focused on queer characters that I watched? Much like <i>Paris is Burning<\/i> (1990)\u2014from which I\u2019d bet it directly lifted its opening scene\u2014it now seems clear that there is a missed opportunity here; RuPaul is the only actual drag queen with a (brief) speaking role. But I was glad to learn from this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.advocate.com\/commentary\/2015\/08\/13\/op-ed-amazing-story-behind-wong-foo\">touching retrospective<\/a> on how the film got made that its creation included and involved gay people, at least. And because of that I think it holds up pretty well. Mitch Kohn writes \u201cthe film itself may not have sparked much if any social change,\u201d and indeed I don\u2019t know about \u201csparked.\u201d But it\u2019s in part because of this movie that I grew up in small-town Kentucky perceiving drag as something fun and attractive, not menacing. I\u2019m grateful for that, and fond of this.<\/li>\n<li><i>Notting Hill<\/i> (1999): Caroline Siede\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/film.avclub.com\/notting-hill-brought-two-rom-com-titans-together-1842910191\">AV Club series<\/a> on romantic comedies, one per year, has been reliably great and insightful; after reading the linked article about Notting Hill I found myself nostalgic and talked Kat into watching it with me. She had never seen it; I remembered it fondly, but unlike <i>To Wong Foo<\/i>, the surface sheen is gone for me here.<\/p>\n<p>During my most intense phase of teenage longing for heartache fiction, I was ready to project a lot of subtlety onto work that didn\u2019t actually have much to offer. Even a few years later, I had figured out that ridiculous movies like <i>In Love and War<\/i> (1996) or <i>Bed of Roses<\/i> (1996) were not worth the feelings I had assigned to them&mdash;though <i>While You Were Sleeping<\/i> (1995) is still one for the ages. I don\u2019t think <i>WYWS<\/i> is shot remarkably better than <i>Notting Hill<\/i>&mdash;though it does have a better score&mdash;and I don\u2019t think Hugh Grant and <a href=\"\/nfd\/2019\/02\/05\/january-movie-roundup\/\">Julia Roberts<\/a> lack for chemistry and charm.<\/p>\n<p>But one of a few things that has happened between my initial viewing of <i>Notting Hill<\/i> and the present day is that its writer, Richard Curtis, directed <i>Love Actually<\/i> (2003), which I have been made to watch several times and which I dislike more with each repetition. The similarities in stagy dialogue and artificial stakes are obvious now, and are more than enough to sink this movie for me. Its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Ce_BXD_ONQ8\">bravura long take<\/a> introduced me to Bill Withers, though, once upon a time, and it is one bit that\u2019s still worth watching.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li><i>Shaolin and Wu Tang<\/i> (1983): Man, it has been a very long time since I wrote about movies! One thing I started doing back in May is subscribing to a series of live-streamed movies through <a href=\"https:\/\/cinema.36chambers.com\">36 Cinema<\/a>, which is a spinoff from <a href=\"https:\/\/36chambers.com\/\">36 Chambers<\/a>, which as you might guess is a Wu-Tang production&mdash;specifically, one created by RZA and a startup marketing dude named Mustafa Shaikh. A link to the livestream costs ten bucks, but you\u2019re not just watching the movie, you\u2019re listening to live commentary from a couple of charming experts. For the first few, that was RZA himself, accompanied by Dan Halsted! You probably don\u2019t know who that is, but he has made cameos in movie roundups of days past, because he\u2019s the guy with the huge celluloid collection who programs and presents Kung Fu Movie Night at the Hollywood Theater in Portland.<\/p>\n<p>I found this combination irresistible: two nerds who not only have decades of history with the genre, but have done a lot of work in their respective ways to honor it and introduce it to new audiences. They named appearances by veteran actors and talked about production history; Dan told stories about finding stacks of film reels in disused auditoriums and RZA pointed out different styles of kung fu in action. I learned a lot! Despite that, my full notes on the film read as follows: \u201cthis movie rules.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li><i>Shogun Assassin<\/i> (1980): Same situation as above, except this time my notes read, in toto, \u201cthis movie rules so hard.\u201d It actually comprises the opening of one Lone Wolf And Cub movie and the remainder of another in the same series, but it works really well! (And it was originally distributed by Roger Corman!) Because it\u2019s a samurai movie, of course, not a kung fu movie, there\u2019s lots of standing still while blood fountains out of people rather than intricately matching choreography. I never got into Lone Wolf or any of its various adaptations&mdash;I have a hard time with impassive, impenetrable protagonists, inasmuch as Ogami functions as a protagonist at all. But the use of film as a medium&mdash;composition, color grading, bold editing, even vignetting&mdash;is superb.<br \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Girl Who Leapt Through Time (2006): Second in a series of \u201cbittersweet, moving anime movies about adolescent feelings as crystallized through a speculative fiction device which I watched with Kat and her friends Courtney and Kailey, which activity has delivered some of my favorite moments in the last few months.\u201d Not quite the technical [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[141,23,118,124,140],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kat","category-movies","category-nostalgia","category-portland","category-roundups"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3246"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3249,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3246\/revisions\/3249"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}