{"id":2413,"date":"2011-12-31T10:54:31","date_gmt":"2011-12-31T18:54:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/?p=2413"},"modified":"2011-12-31T10:54:31","modified_gmt":"2011-12-31T18:54:31","slug":"the-social-network-and-tinker-tailor-soldier-spy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/2011\/12\/31\/the-social-network-and-tinker-tailor-soldier-spy\/","title":{"rendered":"The Social Network and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>They&#8217;re both stories about white guys sitting down and quietly talking. They also both made a tremendous impact on me: one by reminding me that I must yet reckon with Sorkin, the other by making me aware that le Carr&eacute; is not just another popular novelist from before my time but an outright craftmaster.<\/p>\n<p>There are other similarities. Everyone is glib, but in Sorkinland people use their flip lines to express their deepest feelings, whereas in le Carr&eacute; glibness is a rigid fencing match of protocol that may mean nothing or everything. They&#8217;re also both stories about a dangerous little man who doesn&#8217;t understand women, and about betrayal. But now I&#8217;m stretching the parallels out for no particular reason. Le Carr&eacute; doesn&#8217;t sound like Sorkin, he sounds like (he must have been an influence on) my favorite prose stylist, William Gibson.<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t realize until I went back and read the foreword that much of the trade jargon in Tinker Tailor is pure invention, or at least pure extrapolation&#8211;a sort of nadsat projected into the past. Now, because language devours itself, some of it has <i>become<\/i> real jargon. Did you know that the OED can&#8217;t find any use of the word &#8220;mole&#8221; to describe an embedded double agent before le Carr&eacute;? He doesn&#8217;t think he made it up, but then Gibson didn&#8217;t really invent &#8220;cyberspace&#8221; either.<\/p>\n<p>Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy is a very good book and you should read it. Then we should go see the movie together.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They&#8217;re both stories about white guys sitting down and quietly talking. They also both made a tremendous impact on me: one by reminding me that I must yet reckon with Sorkin, the other by making me aware that le Carr&eacute; is not just another popular novelist from before my time but an outright craftmaster. There [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,25,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-connections","category-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2413"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2413\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2415,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2413\/revisions\/2415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/nfd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}