{"id":720,"date":"2012-11-14T14:14:13","date_gmt":"2012-11-14T18:14:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/?p=720"},"modified":"2013-06-13T14:03:34","modified_gmt":"2013-06-13T18:03:34","slug":"is-it-or-isnt-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/archives\/720","title":{"rendered":"Is it or isn\u2019t it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cMan himself is mute, and it is the image that speaks. For it is obvious that the image alone can keep pace with nature.\u201d
\n\u2014Boris Pasternak<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Those who speak or write as though they understand everything about this medium do not know what they are talking about. But, to be honest, I have never met anyone who behaves that way, so perhaps my opening declaration is meaningless. Sometimes it is even difficult to classify what we do as artists in order to place the effort in some category. I just encountered an interesting chunk of round-table discourse<\/a> by a new online discussion group struggling to define their area of focus. Most distinctions made between what artists call collage, montage, assemblage, construction, layerism, mixed-media, digital art, illustration, or graphic design are somewhat arbitrary, and we continue to see new terms coined by those who hope to distinguish what they perceive as a unique approach. At any rate, the intent of the artist is central. Clearly, definitions in art are rarely necessary except when attempting to trace a cross-pollination or lineage of influences, and when an organized effort or exhibition requires mutually acknowledged parameters. Additionally, there are always other important considerations to discuss, such as: What is an original? What is the relationship between process and artifact? What is the purpose of reproduction? Does a nomenclature based on exclusion have intellectual validity, or is it simply an adjunct to merchandising?
\n <\/p>\n

\"A<\/a><\/p>\n

A likely story indeed!<\/em><\/strong>
\ncollage miniature by J A Dixon
\n4 x 6 inches
\n 
\nPurchase this artwork!<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cMan himself is mute, and it is the image that speaks. For it is obvious that the image alone can keep pace with nature.\u201d \u2014Boris Pasternak Those who speak or write as though they understand everything about this medium do not know what they are talking about. But, to be honest, I have never met […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51,30,1,11,37,36,13,18,35],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=720"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2009,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions\/2009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xorph.com\/jadixon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}